Making wormholes is sought after by all cosmology fanatics, because it would mean inter-galactic travel, but is the theory of wormholes actually true? If it was would you really be able to control where you go? I think you would go to the same place you were before (likely in planetary orbit around earth) And you would instantly start disintegrating into nothingness, and the reason is in my last theory, the theory that anti-matter is the product of a negatively charged universe, unlike ours. But more on that is in the post.
Making these portals would require the manipulation of negative energy, likely opening the skin (or whatever it is) between our universe and there's. Which would be awesome, but also dangerous, for them and for us. (if there is a them)
Wednesday, October 30, 2013
Anti-matter is real, and apparently it's elementaly specific which amazed me to find. Me and a guy I know Ryan were having a conversation, and he brought up anti-matter, and i figured it was impossible because it would annihilate instantly, but there are other ways to control it.
I think anti-matter is the product of a universe parallel to ours where anti-matter dominated the existence of matter as we know it by (1/1,000,000,000) instead of the other way around, (our universe). Anti-hydrogen stars produced negative energy the same way our sun makes positive energy. ( All this throwing out the theory that there are other universes similar to ours, but vibrating at a different tone. (which is preposterous))
Making them undetectable in our electromagnetic spectrum, but they are. Steven Hawking has a theory that there were multiple universes around us at the time of the big bang, but they weren't perfect like our's, either matter and anti-matter destroyed each other, or something else happened to make the production of hydrogen impossible. But this "negative" universe is likely exactly the same as ours, except completely opposite (particle-wise) , my "anti-self" is likely writing the same thing I am on his computer, and you're "anti-self" is reading this blog post.
About dark-matter, I haven't yet decided whether or not they have dark-matter like us, or if to use it would be "light-matter" if this is the case, then this might be what they're milky-way would likely look like.
I think anti-matter is the product of a universe parallel to ours where anti-matter dominated the existence of matter as we know it by (1/1,000,000,000) instead of the other way around, (our universe). Anti-hydrogen stars produced negative energy the same way our sun makes positive energy. ( All this throwing out the theory that there are other universes similar to ours, but vibrating at a different tone. (which is preposterous))
Making them undetectable in our electromagnetic spectrum, but they are. Steven Hawking has a theory that there were multiple universes around us at the time of the big bang, but they weren't perfect like our's, either matter and anti-matter destroyed each other, or something else happened to make the production of hydrogen impossible. But this "negative" universe is likely exactly the same as ours, except completely opposite (particle-wise) , my "anti-self" is likely writing the same thing I am on his computer, and you're "anti-self" is reading this blog post.
About dark-matter, I haven't yet decided whether or not they have dark-matter like us, or if to use it would be "light-matter" if this is the case, then this might be what they're milky-way would likely look like.
Tuesday, October 29, 2013
I was reading a page on Wikipedia about nuclear fusion, and the writer said that there were complications with charging the hydrogen plasma... And at that very second i was delighted to have come up with the solution, NEON, or more preferably the most conductive noble gas. Charging it in a highly pressurized form would probably be conductive enough to form helium molecules, producing phenomenal amounts of energy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)